|
SBF9169LR
Senior Member
USA
97 Posts |
 Posted - 11/19/2004 : 08:50:43 AM
|
I do not read back--just incase--to scary.
I get to talk with drivers without LL knowing--interesting happenings and revelations; but not gossip. Facts. The "word" of what the powerful can and do do is out there though.
LL is being discussed out of their view in CyberSpace and via pass- the-word.
Do you know about contributing to "blogging"? I first did many years before being work-injured or even owning a puter or know how to go online. It was about a different serious work matter; in which those forced to be involved found each other--and learn what is now going on--I was trusted with the info I provided then, so also trusted with info I can provide now. Even "Then", others were already finding their way--I was able to add on! I really, truly wish I could reveal more but the powerful would then learn how to interfer.
LL, WC, UTU and all cronies are in a WWW and VVV internet spotlight they have not yet been able to find and mess up. LL, UTU, etc. are still deluting the actualities of injuries. "It ain't easy" to not tell all who could be in the same situations, but help is happening while and where the powerful cannot sent their disguised cronies in to insult and scare into a shut up mode! But the helpful are already findable and also set up ffr through those who have been put through the powerful wringers. Hint: When SERIOUS matters at work get too tought to manage, don't ask the bosses or, in this case the UTU union reps who hush up; ask the person answering the telephone who knows where to go due to like-and-kind experiences for themselves or some dear tothem! Those bosses consider the "underlings" are much better informed; especially in two important matters that happen at places of employment. D---(arn). I wish I could elaborate beyond WC, but, that would send the wrong ones asearching for damage control as well as a search for references to themselves!
Remember that in all things LL and their cronies, they immediately and even in relation to WC, already set up their own folks in disguise online to glean, disrespect and spead fear for the benefit of the big boys!
(Remember your history and the meaning of VVV? There are those who are able to do that!)
In my last post about "blogging" all things LAIDLAW (Natl. School Bus and Cottrell), the UTU AND Workers' Compensation in NYS, etc., I forgot to repeat that I fell out of a school bus being used for STORAGE by the then and still existing manager at what was a run down Gruner Terminal.
Among other atrocities I and other millions of SERIOUSLY injured former employees across the two countries in N. American must endure because if an injured employee does not know how to find out they will never know, and in my case...
...Is that although the school bus I fell out of was being used for STORAGE of booster seats, (which LL wants to be referred to as child car seats), I discovered years later that I was listed by LL has having had a VEHICULAR ACCIDENT. That would mean that I was driving something. NOT TRUE. I was not driving. Although the dispatcher (verified) and myself were tring to find the sole mechanic (his name, time, day and date verified), the manager (well documented) told me to get the "car seats"; off of the bus he had them STORED ON (verified--there are decent people in professions interested on what actually happens--who are blogging bigger time than is known).
An interesting thing on auto insurance matters happened: When we wanted to change our private auto ins. coverage, and I tried and tried to have that done only in provable ways, it was not until I provably wanted to know if I was listed as having had a VEHICULAR ACCIDENT on 9-9-98 that, quite by surprise, and without answering that question, the insurance change became an immediately done-deed! Hmmmmmm
I also have stated here the WC cleaverness of the "doctor" who put 12 actual head and point carpentty-like screws, two braces and one pin; all titanium, in my right leg, and, took some bone marrow from my right hip to place into my damaged right knee, but never said a word about the damaged condtition of my right toes, foot and ankle, so that future docs were able to say that I had clubbed toes, which miraculeously cured themselves, so that even those toes, foot and ankle damages were not suppose to be able to be related to the work injuries. ONLY THE KNEE IS PERMANENTLY TO BE A WC AND OTHER CRONIES CONSIDERATION! (Understand? No matter how much more serious work-damage occurred; only the least possible to get away with is EVER varifiable! And this gradually becomes known to the work-made totally helpless after is it supposedly too late to do a thing!)
No matter how many times I told that operating doc something very wrong was happening to my "back", he totally ignored that even to the point of not taking even one X-ray. That is unbelievable that he and the first "doc" at the first hospital I was taken to on that 9-9-98 date would not have the medical sense to X-ray, MRI and/or CT all of my body including the "back" area due the extent of my actual leg injuries.
I have to think that both first two docs must have thoroughly examinded ALL WORK-RELATED DAMAGE TO ME, but I can't get at that kind of information on my own--others can--something like the way the cronies are able to fake their way into online information, insults and scarys. (Strange responses happened to me while I was trying to find if that my spinal column was in fact originally viewed--but places that used to be well organized are nowin a mess so others can get in.)
Spinal or spinal column damage is a nono in diagnoses for WC. WC is able to misdiagnoses spinal damage down to practically nonexistant.
It is VERY IMPORTANT TO REALIZE THAT WC IS ONLY AND ACTUALLY set up and paid for ENTIRELY FOR THE BENEFIT of the employER and insurance interests; NOT IN ANY WAY for the employEE--although careful wording makes WC appear to be about helping the work-injured. All lawyers who work with WC are working for WC. So are all doctors. Even consulting with one's own lawyer or doctor must revert back to what WC wants to happen to the work-injured. The only time legitimate legal or medical services are provided if there is third party involvement--Example: If the school bus is rearended by a vehicle owned by a trucking company. After many years and haggling; that third party trucking company can be sued). No suing is allowed through WC's interests. No lawyer will go against WC even if the doc is a crackpot disguised as a doc but actually an IME who works only for insurance interests!
My present experiences with the two hospitals are revealing deliberate and provable misdiagnosing with the consent of HN--do you know what HN actually is?--and my inabliltiy to find honestly in help I need at WC.
When my work injuries first happened, there was provably nothiing wrong with my spinal column. Somehow that did not count with WC! And none of five preceeding docs would check out that damage did occur at work on 9-9-98.
It was sixteen and eighteen months later that more spinal column damage occured as a result of no diagnosis of the original damage.
The operating doc told me I had the bone conditions of a "Youth", in the presence of a GENEX "nurse" (who invited herself into my home without revealing what she was actually up to and become my bosom buddy and best pal, as and after she snuck in with a legitimate nurse and home therapist).
Then, EIGHTEEN MONTHS LATER, and as more spinal damage was visibly and provable occuring because my "back" could not "take it" anymore, that was the first time I was given a bone density test! And that test (which is a visible X-ray copied and sent to may legitimate help places ffr) shows the areas of work damage in BLACK! Black is not suppose to happen! Those were damaged hot spots! But WC and a particular law Judge do not EVER--HMMM have to acknowledge that--FFRed.)
The most recent bone density test reports that I have a different form of osteoporosis in my spinal column--kind of a permanent mangleing unexplained. Hmmmmm It is not suppose to be referred to as premanent residual spinal column vert work-related and careLESSness damage!
I am not suppose to be able to challenge that that current bone density tests will always list the work-damage to my spinal column as if it was originally (in my case, provably nonexisting) oseoporosis!
The nightmare that is WC and LL will remain a continuing challenge until and unless the fraudlent workings of Workers' Compensation become known to and challenged by the able-to-work public before they are injured and it is too late.
All avenues are used by the powerful to stay clear of responsibility. The fact that the workplace was unsafe and the manager knew what he could get away with does not matter. The powerful have the ability to divert attention to make the injured appear to be already diseased, imcompetant, and responsible while deliberately lying about such diversions such as that there was no careLESSness on the employer's part but that a VEHICULAR ACCIDENT had occurred! (Still no trace of my report my husband took to the Gruner Rd. Terminal. In some posts I was not sure where that report wen--I was in horrible pain for a very long time and taking a narcotic and my husband was very worried--making it easy for the unresponsible to be unresponsible-- that has all been clarified. Meanime, no mattered how injured, is is important for someone near and dear, if not the work-injured, to think to send such important documents via postal certified mail only. Don't even trust that someone else, even a lawyer, has done that even if it was said to be done, and, know that FAXes or regular postal mailings can be and are conveniently "lost" if protection from the seriously work-injured is required.)
That need to be heard and respected is the purpose of "blogging" behind-the-secnes and ffr, WWWing and the little-known VVVing.
Having been a sbd for 21 years, I still feel a connection with the job and the drivers' concerns! Concerns sb, part-time, benefitless drivers are not suppose to learn about. And, apparently, although I am probably deleted here at SBF before any actual drivers can read this, I still can put through a post here at SBF!
PS to SBF: I no longer have the old E-address, but my actual address is on your record for contact. (Scaryingly, my personal info is also on SBF and other website records for doing scary stuff! And, I have EMed to SBF using my present E-address--no response came back.
I am well aware that the internet and other communications are happening about me; but none are directed to me in any form. Even the simple courtesy of a reply is not afforded to me. ccffr-wl-pob11-19-4
Why is it that what I see here and the spacing in the Preview are different? |
|
Forgot to add necessities for "blog"ability
