School Bus Fleet Magazine Forums
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
 All Forums
 Management/Operations
 Enter Forum: Management/Operations
 Drug Testing Policy
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

Debusguy
Senior Member

USA
114 Posts

Posted - 12/17/2001 :  06:44:38 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Now that we have had drug & alcohol testing for many years, has anyone come across a situation that required your drug policy to be revised, or at least reviewed?

wagonmaster
Top Member

USA
2298 Posts

Posted - 12/19/2001 :  07:04:00 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
We use a random test for all employees with a CDL. Names are computer generated completely at random. It's a little strange because some names will come up two or three times and some hardly ever come up for testing, but I guess thats why it's called "random". Seems to work for us. We have caught a few that were positive, and thats the idea.
Joe

Go to Top of Page

cowlitzcoach
Advanced Member

USA
325 Posts

Posted - 12/20/2001 :  07:05:42 AM  Show Profile  Visit cowlitzcoach's Homepage  Reply with Quote
I am not sure exactly what you mean when you talk about a situation that might make one want to change the policy.

We have a zero tolerance policy. I forsee no reason to ever change that policy. When you are transporting people you have an obligation to do your best. When you are transporting little people you are legally charged with a higher obligation.

I cannot imagine any situation in which I would want to change a zero tolerance policy.

Mark O.

Go to Top of Page

Debusguy
Senior Member

USA
114 Posts

Posted - 12/20/2001 :  08:13:58 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Mark, a situation arose in which a driver was tested and the test showed Chromate in her system. She made a very strong case to the school administration that the trace was due to Chromium Picolinate (?), a legal weight loss/metabolism additive. Unfortunately, she gave the MRO involved an attitude, and was required to go through training in a substance abuse program. Was it a valid assertion on her part? Depends who you ask. The MRO states it was an adulteration..the employee, who up to now has had a good record, and displayed no suspicious behavior, swears that it was the result of an off-the-counter weight loss product. One thing for sure, there is defitely a barn door that must be shut, policy-wise..I'm looking for other people's insights. LM

Go to Top of Page

John Farr
Top Member

USA
642 Posts

Posted - 12/20/2001 :  3:22:26 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
The Feds prescribe certain procedures/activities which cannot be altered. On the local level our leaders have lattitude to rehab or release. In our case, it is "zero tolerance," which is consistent with the way our Board od Ed deals with students. I do not see this changing for us.

Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
 


School Bus Fleet Magazine Forums © 2022 School Bus Fleet Magazine Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.6 seconds. Snitz Forums 2000